Saturday, June 16, 2018

Edge change before direction change.

If you want to carve from turn to turn, change your edges before you turn. Notice the tracks left behind they are purely carved. Here I am about to start the next pure carve. I retracted or bend my legs, changes edges with my lower body. Now I'm ready to get the skis into the snow and create more angles.

Friday, June 15, 2018

Similarity between well trained skiers!

Reilly McGlashan spectacular free skier!

Thursday, June 7, 2018

The fundamentals are lacking, because Skills Quest by USSA is a failure.

USSA Development

Skills Quest could be a good idea, if they had the right people dsigning the skills. The US coaching staff has no idea what the world cup skiers are doing differently.
The skier above is doing the best she can. However it's not the way to ski. It's not the way the World Cup skiers ski, it's American coaching. The upper body is leaning inside. All the weight is on the inside of the body, the hips are square. Nobody winning on the world cup is skiing with hips square like this. No one on the world cup who is winning has the feet seperated as is the case here. This is not reversable. Once a young skier adapts this posture and position they are doomed.
       World cup overall champion twice, Anna Fenninger Veith, and she is still a world cup contender.
Does anyone in USSA development know why there is a huge difference between the way these two skiers use balance and technique? I'm sure they don't, because in the first photo, the skier is an example of USSA development skiing. This skiing will never acheive the highest levels of World Cup skiing.

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Flexing and ski angle changes during arcs.

On slalom skis, the body reaction to ski angle changes and leg angles have to be immediate.  Personally, I add the upper body changes also like new CA for the next arc, after the new edges are established. 

By this, I mean lower body "flexed leg tipping",  this occurs first then, you can see that CA is applied as the outside leg lengthens. There is so much happening right in the transition that any mis-timing or delay in either flexing/tipping or CA, loses the optimal arc. 

This is why when I hear USSA and US Ski Team development coaches constantly telling kids to move thier hips up and forward I have to cringe. No one in the top seed in the world does what the US Development coaches are telling our kids.

You can see this on the world cup. You also have to take into account the boot set up. For example, as your boot set-up gets softer, you need more counteracting to keep the lower leg straighter through the apex. As I you notice in my own videos, if my set up is softer I have to counteract further.  This is due to the adjustments with the cuff. Moving the cuffs away from my leg reduces weird ankle and leg angles, but can soften the edge development feel. 

At this point, when I see this set up on video, I made the sole canting "stronger" to compensate for the cuff movement. We have figured this out from years of testing with at least 50 ski racers. I definitely realize when watching video during filming sessions that when the setup is softer than what I want, you are at the point where the last bit of control is done with sole canting.

What you are pointing out here is the mystery of what brings skiing to the next or highest level.

When a ski racers is at the apex, especially the best skiers on their best runs, soften the outside leg by bending and while the pressure is reduced increase the tipping angles. This can be done without loss of speed or carving angles. In fact, doing this increases carving angles and tightens the radius under the gate. To many observers, this movement looks like it is done by adding femur rotation. Not so!

Few observers are even aware that this is happening, because few skiers can create this timing consistently. The softening or bending of the leg outside leg (during the arc) allows a controlled momentary pressure reduction. For that instant, it gives you access to further tipping ability, giving you higher angles.

The skis, therefore, react to the angle change and tighten the radius. If you look at my skiing over the years, you can see I do this in short turns where I'm arcing tight radius turns. If the skier doesn't apply this technique, they have to wait for the ski sidecut to create the bottom "C" of the arc, which doesn't create as energetic or as precise a line to the next gate. You can see that in my article on my Blog, where I compare Hirscher to the other his two other competitors. 

Keeping the outside leg long or stretched through the bottom "C" of the arc is slow. So now I can get to answering your question directly. Your CA doesn't need to increase at this point if you have the right amount established and have a you ski tails carving and holding.

However, you do have to hold your countered hip strongly at the release or your hips will tend to square up and drag the upper body with it. This is really obvious in GS turns. When you apply this approach, keep a long leg you will have to Immediately, flex and then push off to start flexing again to begin the release. In effect a double release. Making the tansition very weak, and very slow.

These are a highly integrated and coordinated movement patterns, very hard to teach, it's  intuitive to some.

There are skiers that have this ability without realizing they use it. Reilly MacGlasin has it and he didn't know how he did it. When I began coaching him,  I brought this to light for him. I have written about this movement sparingly because it's a really high-end movement understanding, and everything else needs to be right before you can have someone even attempt it. This is so difficult to isolate for someone because it all happens in such a short time frame and there is so much high energy, high angles, and high forces needed to accomplish it. It's very difficult to duplicate slowly in exercises. The closest exercise I've been able to use to re-create the experience is the 'Power Release', from the "Essentials of Skiing" book. 

As a side note, you can't do this if you are trying to go too straight at the gates. The reason is this method has to begin as a round, high C arc, so that the finish can be set up properly. I've known about this technique for decades because I realized I used it. People who analyzed my skiing couldn't explain how I got so much energy and a tightening arc out of the bottom of my turns. They also always remarked that I don't look rushed or didn't ever have to hit my edges hard at the bottom, yet my race times were always fast.

It's a technique worth learning.

Friday, June 1, 2018

Why are coaches so ineffective?

Why are some coaches so ineffective?

This Letter is in response to Irwin's e-mail.

Some will say they are idiots. 

Hi Irwin,

Interesting topic, here are some thoughts.

I look at the situation and challenges of learning how skiing works from this point of view. What I find lacking when people can't figure out movement or order of movements that create skiing, it is based in the lack of the following understandings:

Self awareness of movement
Lacking visual interpretation of movements (basic movement analysis)
Lack of ability to recognition forces acting on the body, from the slope
No understanding or a misunderstanding of forces acting through the body
Missing the simple mechanics of skis
Never including or relating to how the feel and understanding of balance occurs and when it should happen.
Lack of body movement knowledge: isolating one movement, while creating with another

Finding these things lacking, I don't feel is caused by being an idiot. I'd rather say, it's just not part of the gifts inherently possessed by humans. However, there are exceptions, and those exceptions are reserved for gifted humans in these disciplines. Some are born with and have an inherently complete knowledge of every category I listed above. Obviously helped by some basic education, but after that, it comes to them easily and develops through further investigation and experimentation. 

Most skiers and ski educators don't have these gift, or have not been trained to recognize them; even those high on the instruction food chain in our national organizations such as USSA and PSIA don't get it.

The rest of us have to learn, either by rote memory, repetition, or step by step duplication. However to study and learn these skills there has to be proper instruction and the coriculum has to be well structred and delivered. I have yet to see this kind of education at any level in skiing. 

Most people don't immediately translate even correct, effective movement information, into their bodies. And even if they do, restructuring and delivering these movements for others to learn is a elusive skill that requires a high level of teaching. 

This becomes obvious when you watch hundreds of instructors trying to produce highly effective movement lessons for the masses, that they can't interpret. It's just not happening! Only 1 out of 10 instructors naturally and inherently grasp "to us that have observed" a logical progression. We all know how difficult it is to produce logical, easy to achieve step by step, movement progressions that achieve an effective ski turn. 

If this were not the case, you wouldn't have convoluted ski systems all over the alpine skiing world that actually harm human movement learning, rather then helping. 

The examples I draw on to be able to express these comments come from observation of traditional ski instruction. We know this by observing results from thousands of instructors in the world, that buy into totally ineffective movements for skiers. Irwin, if the theories you describe about idiots were the case, it would mean idiots dominate the ski teaching landscape. Is it legit to call almost 99% of ski instructors idiots, or would it be preferable to categorize them as less gifted or uninterested?

From a survival, practical and physiological point of view, if you don't have the observation skills or you are limited in the rest of the abilities I listed above; you have to invent other methods by which you can interpret the sport, based on limitations you possess. 

An analogy might be, if you didn't understand how to make rubber for bike tires, you might end up with wooden rims. Sure they work and you can ride on wooden tires, but is it the best way? Yes, it's the best way, "for you", if you don't know rubber. Your solution for a wheel to work with materials at hand is solely based on your understanding of what is available to you.

One conclusion could be, sure idiots all, except for a few gifted and interested. However, I would rather take the road that tells me; everyone can learn from the gifted if they are motivated to learn. Then you would be able to say, idiots are the ones that don't want to investigate and learn from the best performers. That is, if those performers have figured out how to convey movements, to achieve the best performances.

Fun topic,